Client Facing Fresh ADVO Breaches and Intimidation While Already on ICO
Our client appeared before the State Parole Authority after his Intensive Correction Order (ICO) was revoked due to new offences involving alleged breaches of an ADVO and intimidation of his former partner.
He was charged with three counts of contravening an ADVO under section 14 of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW) and one count of intimidation under section 13 of the same Act.
The client had a lengthy criminal history with over 10 prior ADVO breach offences. The new charges resulted in a six-month fixed term of imprisonment, and because his ICO had been revoked, he faced remaining in custody for an additional four months after that sentence expired.
Understanding ICO Revocation and the Risk of Additional Jail Time
An Intensive Correction Order allows eligible offenders to serve their custodial sentence in the community under strict supervision.
If an offender commits further offences or breaches the ICO conditions, the order can be revoked, and the person is taken back into custody. The Parole Board then determines whether the ICO should be reinstated or the remainder of the sentence served in full-time custody.
For our client, the stakes were high — without reinstatement, he would remain in jail long after his new sentence was completed.
Defence Strategy: Demonstrating Rehabilitation and Community Benefit
After being contacted by the client’s family while he was in custody, our lawyers prepared a strong submission to the State Parole Authority.
We obtained a detailed reinstatement report from Community Corrections, along with a psychological report, a letter of remorse from the client, and evidence of his previous rehabilitative efforts in the community.
Our argument focused on rehabilitation and public safety — that the client’s risk of reoffending was best managed through supervision and structured programs, rather than prolonged incarceration. We highlighted his demonstrated insight, engagement in counselling, and strong family support network.
Outcome: ICO Reinstated — Jail Time Avoided
The Parole Board accepted our submission and agreed that community supervision was the more appropriate and effective outcome.
✅ The ICO was reinstated, meaning the client was released from custody approximately four months earlier than he otherwise would have been.
✅ He is now continuing his rehabilitation in the community under close supervision.
This result ensured that our client could return home to his family and continue rebuilding his life through structured, supported rehabilitation — rather than remaining in full-time custody.
Tayla’s Insight
“This case demonstrates that even when someone has a long history of breaches, what matters most is genuine rehabilitation and remorse. With strong evidence and preparation, it’s possible to show the Parole Board that community supervision is the better path — and that’s exactly what we achieved here.”
Facing an ICO Revocation or ADVO Breach?
If you or a loved one are facing an ICO revocation, Parole Board hearing, or breach of ADVO, our experienced criminal defence lawyers can help. We regularly appear before the State Parole Authority and Local Courts across NSW.
